How Arcane 101 Wiki Labels Evidence: Verified to Expired
What Verified, Reported, Disputed and Expired mean on the Arcane 101 Wiki, where our facts come from and how we handle dates, sources and corrections.
FAQ
What does Verified mean on this wiki?
What does Reported mean?
Why does the wiki have no tier list?
How do I report a mistake?
What do the four evidence labels mean?
Every game fact on this wiki is tied to one label, so you can see how much weight it can carry. The label sits next to the claim, and the observation date sits next to the numbers.
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Verified | First-party: the Roblox game page, group page, public badges and votes data, or official media. Reproducible, with an observation date. |
| Reported | Third-party sites say so and we could not test it in the game. General facts need at least two independent sources before we write them as fact. Codes need one named source and say when it is the only one. |
| Disputed | Sources contradict each other. We show who says what, and when. |
| Expired | A code that was reported valid and is now reported expired. |

The four labels as they appear across the wiki.
How does the wiki mark its own arithmetic and ordering?
Some statements come from nobody: sorting areas by badge counts, or subtracting the named bosses from the published total. We call these inferred in plain words, show the numbers they come from and the date, and never attach a Verified label to them.
Where do the facts come from?
We start from what Roblox itself publishes about Arcane 101: the game page, the Lucky’s Pals group, the public badges and votes data, and the official art on the game page. Numbers taken from those sources are labelled Verified and dated 2026-11-15, the day we collected them.
Third-party sources (code sites and community guides) fill the gaps. They count as independent only when they are different publishers that did not copy each other. Mirrors of the same Roblox description do not count as separate sources.
What does the wiki not do?
- It does not borrow mechanics from other games with similar names, such as Wizard101, Arcane Odyssey or Arcane Lineage.
- It does not publish a tier list, a race roster or boss attack patterns, because we found no first-party or independently corroborated data for them. Pages say so under a heading such as “What does the wiki not know yet?”.
- It does not call a code Verified. No code list that we can read without logging in is published by the developer, so codes are Reported, Disputed or Expired at best.
What is the difference between “observed” and “last checked”?
The observed date is when we read a number from its source, for example badge counts on 2026-11-15. The last checked date on a page is the last time we compared the page’s sources again. Fixing a typo does not change it. Live numbers such as players online move all the time, so those pages call themselves snapshots. See Player count and stats for an example.
How are conflicts and mistakes handled?
When two sources disagree, we do not pick a winner. The codes ledger shows two codes that sources contradict each other on, with each side’s date. A label can move in either direction when new evidence arrives, and the page’s check date moves with it.
If you spot a mistake, or you can settle a disputed point with a screenshot or a source, tell us through the contact page. Name the page and the source. We would rather change a label than leave a wrong sentence standing.
Related Articles
bosses
Arcane 101 Bosses: Three Named, Eight Still Unnamed
Which Arcane 101 bosses are named in official text, which are only implied by badges, and why this wiki does not publish boss strategies yet.
bosses
Arcane 101 Areas and Progression: 8 Lands, 11 Bosses
How many lands and bosses Arcane 101 has, what the nine area-clear badges mean, and how far players progress by award counts on 2026-11-15.
codes
Arcane 101 Codes (Nov 2026): Reported, Disputed, Expired
Every Arcane 101 code we know of with its reward, the sources that list it and the date we compared them. Two codes are disputed between sources.
Was this helpful?
Thanks for the feedback!